Conditional Preferences Based on Triadic Modal Logic
نویسندگان
چکیده
We concern ourselves in this paper with formalization of conditional preferences based on modal logic. We indicate four basic requirements for the task and show that meeting them jointly presents a challenge to existing dyadic modal logics of preferences. As an alternative, we introduce a minimal system, MCP, of triadic modal logic, which is consistent and also frame sound and frame complete with respect to its neighborhood semantics. A simple yet powerful mechanism of preference optimization is also developed on the basis of MCP, which embodies the criteria of maximal partial satisfaction, specificity, and positive utility. Our investigation in the paper shows that this formalization meets all of the requirements to a certain extent.
منابع مشابه
A Modal Characterization of Defeasible Deontic Conditionals and Conditional Goals
We explore the notions of permission and obligation and their role in knowledge representation, especially as guides to action for planning systems. We first present a simple conditional deontic logic (or more accurately a preference logic) of the type common in the literature and demonstrate its equivalence to a number of modal and conditional systems for default reasoning. We show how the tec...
متن کاملToward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory
We present a logic for representing and reasoning with qualitative statements of preference and normality and describe how these may interact in decision making under uncertainty. Our aim is to develop a logical calculus that employs the basic elements of classical decision theory, namely probabilities, utilities and actions, but exploits qualitative information about these elements directly fo...
متن کاملA Logic for Conditional Possibility
In this paper, we present a logical framework for integrating the quantitative and qualitative approaches to uncertainty management based on possibility theory. The semantics of the logic is based on the Dempster’s rule of conditioning for possibility theory. It is then shown that classical modal logic, conditional logic, possibilistic logic, quantitative modal logic and qualitative possibilist...
متن کاملSuhrawardi's Modal Syllogisms
Suhrawardi’s logic of the Hikmat al-Ishraq is basically modal. So to understand his modal logic one first has to know the non-modal part upon which his modal logic is built. In my previous paper ‘Suhrawardi on Syllogisms’(3) I discussed the former in detail. The present paper is an exposition of his treatment of modal syllogisms. On the basis of some reasonable existential presuppositi...
متن کاملDynamic Choice under Ambiguity
This paper analyzes sophisticated dynamic choice for ambiguity-sensitive decision makers. It characterizes Backward Induction and a single-person version of Subgame Perfection via axioms on preferences over decision trees. Furthermore, it indicates how to elicit conditional preferences from prior preferences. The key axiom is a weakening of Dynamic Consistency, deemed Sophistication. The analys...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005